My Thoughts...

@import url(//www.blogger.com/css/navbar/main.css); @import url(//www.blogger.com/css/navbar/3.css); function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/13989647?origin\x3dhttps://soulcheeky.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } });

soulcheeky. Based in sunny island. Star sign-Cancerian. Contact me: Soul-cheeky

Random events, thoughts & remarks based on fragments of the writer's life experiences & ccurrences. Not meant to be offensive or imposing but just a way of life. Feel free to drop me a note if you're impressed or distressed (by my posts).

June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007

maybellicious sweetmusic fm kellyfreakster talk rock BlogSkins Getty Images

Thursday, January 26, 2006

This few days (& the next) I felt like my Department is having our own C.S.I. show. No, there aren't any gruesome murders or bizarre acts but rather, it's suspected fraud & thief.

Though I already have a main suspect, I hate to wrongly accuse someone.

Before you think "nah, boring" .....think again cuz sometimes, somethings are not as simple as it seems. Or maybe so I thought. It could be me watching too many of those TV dramas or movies & thinking too much into it.

Anyway, if you're keen to follow the plot. Continue reading. Sorry for the weak script though, since I'm not a professional.

Title
C.S.I - Singapore
Episode 1: Is it her or is it her?

Casting
Lead Actress: Girl B (who also happens to be my main suspect)
Supporting Actress: Girl A (who also happens to be the narrator of this episode)
Supporting Cast: PI. 1 (me), PI. 2 (superior)

Story
One working day, a public customer handed over a wallet she found in the ladies toilet to Girl A. Girl A then took out the contents of the wallet to check & fill out the details in the Found Item form. She indicated there was $X & several other personal identifications.

Next Girl B entered the scene. Girl B just came back from a ciggie break & was told by Girl A that a wallet was found. Girl B then rummaged through the wallet & told Girl A that $X found in the wallet is a lot.

Girl A then noticed Girl B going through the wallet a few times after that but thought nothing much of it. Not long after, Girl B told Girl A that she'll pass the item to the Security since she's going for her mealbreak soon.

At this point, let me sidetrack a bit & tell you the procedures for handling found items for a better understanding:

1. Check contents of wallet & indicate in the form
2. Pass the item & the original form to the Security
3. Security will photocopy the form & keep the duplicate, while the original will be handed back to the staff for filing at the counter

Ok, so far?

Right, back to the story.

Girl B handed the wallet to Security. Later that night, Security managed to find the owner of the wallet but was told by the owner that cash was missing.

Now, this is where the plot thickens.

1. The original Found item form was not brought back by Girl B to be filed at the counter
2. PI 2 was alerted by Girl A & Security about the missing cash
3. PI 2 then requested the duplicated copy of the Found item form from Security
3. Duplicated copy was signed off by Girl A but description of items found in wallet did not state that there was any cash in it
4. Girl A was asked to verify if the Found item form was a duplicate of her 1st original copy.
5. Girl A said that the handwritting is not hers though the signature made it looks like it was signed by her
6. PI 1 did a 'forensic' check on the handwritting & confirmed that the 'fake' original copy was the handwritting of Girl B
7. PI 1 also confirmed with PI 2 & Girl A that the signature was forged

So now the mystery is - Who took the money? Is it as simple as Girl B is the one who took it? Or could it be Girl A cooked up a story to malign Girl B or could it be Girl A was actually the one who took the $ but make it look like as though it's Girl B? But then, who can explain what happened to the 1st original copy of the Found item form, since that is a piece of crucial evidence? And if Girl B is not the one who took the $, then why did she has to 'reopen' a form & forged the signature of Girl A?

Follow so far?

I have done my a round of investigation with some of the supporting cast & also with Girl A today. I'll conduct an internal inquiry with Girl B tomorrow. But till then, I'm only hearing one side of the story from Girl A. As such, I don't want to jump to conclusion...though I can't help it but strongly suspect, the money was taken by Girl B.

But she can't be that stupid to steal the $ & leave loopholes right?

aiyo...I'm having a headache.